Monthly Archives: July 2009
I’ve spent the last few evenings catching up on some of the posts on JP Boodhoo’s blog (I’m still gutted that I can’t get the go-ahead from work to attend his Nothin’ but .NET Developer Boot Camp). In one of his posts, JP touches upon an issue that really plagues me; the trap of perfectionism.
I’ve often caught myself spending longer than appropriate trying to get something done “right” first time, when it would be far more pragmatic to try the simplest thing that works then refactor. If you catch me doing this (which won’t be hard, I think I do it a lot), you have my permission to slap me!
I think the trick is to making this work is doing “the simplest thing” rather than “the first thing that springs to mind that might work”. It’s also important to make small steps and refactor for this approach to work, keeping technical debt to a minimum.
It’s definitely something I need to work on.
A colleague of mine recently came across Stubs – a Lightweight Stub Framework for .NET and suggested I take a look. Having used both Moq and Rhino Mocks in the past, I was intrigued, and thought I should take a closer look.
I may have gotten the wrong end-of-the-stick, but it seems that Stubs uses code-generation to generate stubs, rather than the more typical dynamic code approach used by other frameworks (reflection and expression trees).
My initial thoughts are:
- I wonder how well the code-gen approach works with TDD? I don’t fancy having to re-run a tool manually every time I create a new interface; the less friction the better!
- I generally would tend to favour dynamic code (reflection, expression trees etc) over code-gen unless performance is a key-factor, since this results in less code to maintain. It may be the case that code-gen here can make a significant reduction in execution time of tests in larger code-bases, although it would be interesting to see some stats for this. It would also be interesting to see whether this approach works out favourably on a long-running project (where interfaces are likely to change) as I can see maintenance of the stubs being a potential issue.
- It’s good to see Microsoft favouring type-safe code rather than using magic strings as they had in other projects (like asp.net MVC)
I seems like this could be an interesting project to keep an eye on, but for the mean-while at least, I think I’ll stick to Rhino Mocks!